Monday, June 12, 2006

do book reviewers read every word?

I read hardly a word last week (partly because I was out of commission, but mostly because I didn’t bring any good books with me), but the week before I finished A Tale of Love and Darkness. It was a disappointing read in that it wasn’t as interesting as I expected as it dragged on for much of the book, something was surely lost in the translation, and Oz’s writing can be quite poetic (sometimes too poetic and wordy for my likes), but it picked up towards the end, and overall, I would recommend it to those who have the patience to read it. Some excerpts:
Once, when I was seven or eight, my mother said to me, as we sat on the last seat but one on the bus to the clinic or the shoe shop, that while it was true that books could change with the years just as much as people could, the difference was that whereas people would always drop you when they could no longer get any advantage or pleasure or interest or at least a good feeling from you, a book would never abandon you. Naturally you sometimes dropped them, maybe for several years, or even forever. But they, even if you betrayed them, would never turn their backs on you: they would go on waiting for you silently and humbly on their shelf. They would wait ten years. They wouldn’t complain. One night, when you suddenly needed a book, even at three in the morning, even if it was a book you had abandoned and erased from your heart for years and years, it would never disappoint you, it would come down from its shelf and keep you company in your moment of need. It would not try to get its own back or make excuses or ask itself if it was worth its while or if you deserved it or if you still suited each other, it would come at once as soon as you asked. A book would never let you down (pp. 275).

I understood where I had come from: from a dreary tangle of sadness and pretense, of longing, absurdity, inferiority and provincial pomposity, sentimental education and anachronistic ideals, repressed traumas, resignation, and helplessness. Helplessness of the acerbic, domestic variety, where small-time liars pretended to be dangerous terrorists and heroic freedom fighters, where unhappy bookbinders invented formulas for universal salivation, where dentists whispered confidentiality to all their neighbors about their protracted personal correspondence with Stalin, where piano teachers, kindergarten teachers, and housewives tossed and turned tearfully at night from stifled yearning for an emotion-laden spiritual life, where compulsive writers wrote endless disgruntled letters to the editor of Davar, where elderly bakers saw Maimonides and the Baal Shem Tov in their dreams…(pp. 492).

3 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Funny you bring this up. I'M in middle of reading this very book and to say the truth I couldn’t agree with you more. The beginning of the book is pretty interesting and figures to make an entertaining read; one thing I never really noticed in Oz is he can be pretty funny and witty. But as the book goes on he becomes way to verbose, trying to be poetic and it just gets annoying. At times I feel like IM getting in a rhythm and then out of the blue it’s all gone and back to some boring and unnecessary anecdote or something of the like. Anyway, until Bob Dylan’s Chronicles arrives in the mail I guess IM stuck with Amos Oz.

6/12/2006 7:34 PM  
Blogger shoshana said...

feel the same way. though i'm not nearly finished--because it drags so. althoughi read parts while i was in israel, and it was most interesting there because i was playing the tourist and so it turned out to be pretty interesting. but haven't picked it up since.

6/13/2006 7:45 AM  
Blogger Goldie said...

After over two weeks of not posting, I'm amazed that people are still checking in. Thanks for reading and commmenting!

6/14/2006 5:50 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home