comical Op-Ed on ban of gay marriage

Too Good for Marriage

LAST week, New York’s highest court voted 4-to-2 that a legislative ban on same-sex marriage did not violate the state Constitution...

What’s noteworthy about the New York decision, however, is that it became the second ruling by a state high court to assert a startling rationale for prohibiting same-sex marriage.

...straight couples may be less stable parents than their gay counterparts and consequently require the benefits of marriage to assist them...

But the New York court also put forth another argument, sometimes called the “reckless procreation” rationale. “Heterosexual intercourse,” the plurality opinion stated, “has a natural tendency to lead to the birth of children; homosexual intercourse does not.” Gays become parents, the opinion said, in a variety of ways, including adoption and artificial insemination, “but they do not become parents as a result of accident or impulse.”

(Reminded me of the argument my high school teachers used to present about how women are on a higher spiratual level than men and thus...)